Novel resistance training-specific rating of perceived exertion scale measuring repetitions in reserve

ABACUS/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Zourdos, Michael C.
dc.contributor.author Klemp, Alex
dc.contributor.author Dolan, Chad
dc.contributor.author Quiles, Justin M.
dc.contributor.author Schau, Kyle A.
dc.contributor.author Jo, Edward
dc.contributor.author Helms, Eric
dc.contributor.author Esgro, Ben
dc.contributor.author Duncan, Scott
dc.contributor.author García Merino, Sonia
dc.contributor.author Blanco, Rocky
dc.date.accessioned 2016-11-02T12:09:30Z
dc.date.available 2016-11-02T12:09:30Z
dc.date.issued 2016
dc.identifier.citation Zourdos, M. C., Klemp, A., Dolan, C., Quiles, J. M., Schau, K. A., Jo, E., ... & Blanco, R. (2016). Novel Resistance Training–Specific Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale Measuring Repetitions in Reserve. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 30(1), 267-275. spa
dc.identifier.issn 10648011
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11268/5960
dc.description.abstract The primary aim of this study was to compare rating of perceived exertion (RPE) values measuring repetitions in reserve (RIR) at particular intensities of 1 repetition maximum (RM) in experienced (ES) and novice squatters (NS). Furthermore, this investigation compared average velocity between ES and NS at the same intensities. Twenty-nine individuals (24.0 ± 3.4 years) performed a 1RM squat followed by a single repetition with loads corresponding to 60, 75, and 90% of 1RM and an 8-repetition set at 70% 1RM. Average velocity was recorded at 60, 75, and 90% 1RM and on the first and last repetitions of the 8-repetition set. Subjects reported an RPE value that corresponded to an RIR value (RPE-10 = 0-RIR, RPE-9 = 1-RIR, and so forth). Subjects were assigned to one of the 2 groups: (a) ES (n = 15, training age: 5.2 ± 3.5 years) and (b) NS (n = 14, training age: 0.4 ± 0.6 years). The mean of the average velocities for ES was slower (p ≤ 0.05) than NS at 100% and 90% 1RM. However, there were no differences (p > 0.05) between groups at 60, 75%, or for the first and eighth repetitions at 70% 1RM. In addition, ES recorded greater RPE at 1RM than NS (p = 0.023). In ES, there was a strong inverse relationship between average velocity and RPE at all percentages (r = −0.88, p < 0.001), and a strong inverse correlation in NS between average velocity and RPE at all intensities (r = −0.77, p = 0.001). Our findings demonstrate an inverse relationship between average velocity and RPE/RIR. Experienced squatter group exhibited slower average velocity and higher RPE at 1RM than NS, signaling greater efficiency at high intensities. The RIR-based RPE scale is a practical method to regulate daily training load and provide feedback during a 1RM test. spa
dc.description.sponsorship Florida Atlantic University spa
dc.language.iso eng spa
dc.title Novel resistance training-specific rating of perceived exertion scale measuring repetitions in reserve spa
dc.type article spa
dc.description.impact 2.060 JCR (2016) Q2, 28/81 Sport Sciences spa
dc.identifier.doi 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001049
dc.rights.accessRights openAccess spa
dc.subject.uem Entrenamiento deportivo spa
dc.subject.uem Condición física spa
dc.subject.unesco Deporte spa
dc.description.filiation UEM spa
dc.peerreviewed Si spa

Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record